Friday, December 17, 2021

A Consultation on Community Driven Nonviolent Economy

 DRAFT JCH Revision: November 12, 2021

A Consultation on Community Driven Nonviolent Economy

Producer Collectives take lessons from SHG Movement

In the past few decades, the Self-Help Group Movement backed by the Government and Non-government-led poverty reduction programs existed across the developing countries. In India, the SHG Movement was financed by the Banking Sector under its priority lending, which was claimed as one of their successful initiatives. The nation-wide drive for financial inclusion of the economically backward classes has however, been received differently in the various regions of the country. Ironically, the most positive result has been the high degree of women’s empowerment, and not the desired goal of financial inclusion.

The SHG Movement has tried to address the twin agendas of economic development in poor families as a part of poverty reduction strategy, and the empowerment of women through leadership development. Now, it is well recognised the world over that marginalized communities need many other services other than credit to increase their incomes for this alone is not sufficient to reduce poverty. In India, many organizational innovations happened in the field of micro-finance. Among membership based microfinance models, co-operatives and SHG Federations became significant models. These models helped the marginalized exercise control over decisions and organizational resources, and they owned and managed organizations to gain benefit for themselves.

These models were by and large driven by donor-sponsored projects, government sponsored livelihood missions and programs, relief and rehabilitation centred programs that had been rolled out after major disasters. Most of the project driven SHG initiatives were short-lived and there were no sustainable institutions of SHGs that continued beyond projects, except a few, which were designed and implemented by NGOs.  

In the recent decade, taking clues from some of the successful aspects of the SHG Movement, farmers’ collectives in the form of Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs) evolved and were nurtured by both Government and Non-Government Organisations working in the farm sector. The FPOs are found to be a viable institutional option to safeguard the best interest of the farmers. The Government of India launched an ambitious program to promote “10,000 FPOs” under its Central Sector Scheme. The Cluster Based Business Organisations are spearheading this mission across the country. Mushrooming numbers of FPOs across the country has been a sign of enthusiastic participation of farmers. Going beyond finance, the producer collectives work on a wide-range of agri-business solutions including improving production efficiency of farms, reducing the transaction costs, efficient value chain interventions, augmenting the social capital that had been built in the producer collectives.

The success of SHG Movement was possible due to several networking and advocacy platforms that had been created at the regional, national, and global levels. These networks facilitated the growth of the SHG Movement by way of advocating for pro-poor policy frameworks, rating and grading of SHG federations, channelizing resources and so on. Unlike the SHG Movement, the producer collectives do not have such a regional or national network nor a clear vision for transforming the producer collectives into a nation-wide Movement.

Unleashing the potential of Producer Collectives

The Indian farming system known for its cooperative and collective community approaches in the form of the exchange of seeds, application of manure, commonly-used farm equipment, manual labour and other resources meant for production. All these exchanges happened informally without any institutional arrangements. For instance, betel vine cultivation in Tamil Nadu is an example of collective farming, where the small farmers and landless labourers joined together and took-up cultivation collectively by pooling their resources and sharing the income. The artisans and handloom weavers united under Sarvodaya Sangams used to exchange their products and services and sell them under a common brand through retail khadi stores. Farmers joining together to repair and maintain the age-old system of irrigation tanks in southern India has been a practice for centuries. Cooperative Movement took its roots from all such indigenous collective community experiences. Producer Collectives, which have become popular today, are the institutionalised forms of informal systems that have existed in our society. There are hundreds of such informal practices and formal institutions based on the principles of mutuality and cooperation.

For instance, even before the rolling out of legal-framework for exclusive producer companies in 2014, CCD did an experiment in 2000 itself by promoting a member-owned community enterprise called “Gram Mooligai Company Limited”. GMCL was the first cooperative of medicinal plants and products as a public limited company set up in the country. It was owned by the rural community of medicinal plant collectors and cultivators because they were its shareholders. CCD along with Ekta Parishad and Swayam Shikshan Prayog (SSP) went on to promote a Confederation of Community-based Enterprises (CEFI) to provide space for community enterprises across the country that exchanged their expertise, shared resources, gained collective strength in the marketing of the produce. Aharam was a second Consortium of Producer Organisations that was promoted by CCD in 2005 to provide an organised enterprise platform for the Producer Organisations. This was working on traditional crops to exchange their produces, collectively market their products and to gain scale advantage.

While these producer collectives and community enterprises were backed by the institutional safeguards through suitable laws and regulations, they also had adopted principles of commerce with moral standing, and ethical standards that included care and concern for fellow human beings and the natural eco-system. They showed the importance of responsible production and consumption as twin goals for mitigating the escalating crisis of climate change. It necessitates economic intermediation, trade and commerce imbibed with reference to Gandhian values of local self-governance and local resource use. JC Kumarappa, known as Gandhi’s economist, postulated the theory of economy based on permanence from the mostly rural Indian context drawing on the spirit of cooperation, service and solidarity that prevails in what he called the ‘natural economy’. He insisted on economic value creation without leading to economy of violence. Building an economy of nonviolence necessitates reversal of priorities such as moving from external dependence to internal self-reliance, macro to micro planning, centralisation to decentralisation.

Producer Collectives as Vehicles of Nonviolent Economy

CCD has been working with the small and marginal farm producers, medicinal plant gatherers and local healers for over three decades in the southern agro-climatic region of Tamil Nadu. It has established Kalasam Livelihood Academy to assimilate and disseminate the accumulated knowledge and experience gained from dealing with the resilient farming practices of smallholder farms, low external input sustainable agricultural production, sustainable collection and conservation of medicinal plant resources and bio-diversity. Catching up with the rapidly growing FPO sector in the recent years, CCD has evolved, designed and implemented a farmer-led community enterprise model among rainfed farmers in southern Tamil Nadu.       

CCD joins with the Jai Jagat, a global campaign spearheaded by Ekta Parishad, an Indian Social Movement that has worked for three decades on land, water, and forest rights. Sharing the common goals of promoting sustainable and responsible production and consumption, and showing the judicious use of rapidly depleting natural resources, while eliminating predatory practices in trade and commerce, CCD aligns with the Jai Jagat Movement for promoting a nonviolent economy based on local action for global change.

There are many successful community enterprise models across south India that could be showcased during the Jai Jagat 2022 campaign in southern India. Subsequently, these initiatives can be replicated in the northern Indian Context.   

Consultation on Success stories of Nonviolent Economy from Grassroots

The 2022 Jai Jagat Campaign is scheduling consultations and field visits in southern India in the period of January and April 2022 with national and international solidarity groups. In preparation for these consultations and exposure visits of nonviolent economy at the grassroots, a meeting of development management experts and practitioners has been scheduled on December 4 & 5, 2021 at CESCI-Madurai. This will act as a reference group in showcasing successful and community driven nonviolent economic initiatives, and determine the lessons learned, identifying their scaling-up potential, the ways and means for horizontal networking and its reinforcement. This consultation is organised at Madurai and facilitated by CCD along with the Jai Jagat campaign group in southern India.

A note on nonviolent practices

 

A note on nonviolent practices

What is a nonviolent economy?

The concept of nonviolent economy emerges out of our understanding that the present model of economy operating around us is violent. As the economic model is top-down, it excludesthe voices and perspectives of millions of people when decisions affecting them are made. We can clearly see that this model of economy is pushingmillions into poverty. The present model respects those who accumulate wealth without looking at the methods that they use in this process. It not only excludes people but also destroys the nature and the planet which we need to survive. Therefore a nonviolent model of economy needs to be bottom-up, participatory and respect human dignity and nature. Ideas regarding the economy articulated by Mahatma Gandhi, J C Kumarappa and Schumacher need to form the foundational principles for developing a nonviolent economy. It needs tostand on a non- exploitative relationship with people and nature and will start with the premise of trusteeship which basically means that we are merely custodians of this planet and not the sole owners of nature and her resources; the economy is then relegated to just one aspect of the entire process. Money is an instrument created by human beings to simplify transactions and not a thing to be accumulated and worshiped. Nonviolent economy will be based on the values of sharing and caring as that is the only way the world can be a happy place.

What is nonviolent lens?

The inspiration for this idea came from a similar idea that has become a norm in today’s development planning. Adopting a gender lens or environmental lens has become quite common in development planning exercise. In doing so, the objective is to promote the gender and environmental dimension in not only planning but also in implementation of programs and projects. We often notice that development projects get mired in conflicts. This is especially true of large projects like construction of a dam or mining of minerals or when when land is acquired for highways, setting up industries for expansion of airports etc. Such large projects create massive displacement, destructionof natural resources and pushes many into poverty and when people organize themselves to express their objection to such projects they come face to face with the police. Such conflicts between police and people are becoming increasingly common in every part of the world. This leads to litigation, imprisonment and untold misery for many. But what is missed is that the genesis of this conflict between people and police is in the planning process and it can be avoided just by adoptinga nonviolent lens at the project planning stage itself. Any planner who is committed to people’s welfare can clearly see through the consequences of their plan on the lives of ordinary people. Nonviolent lens will help him/her to preempt people’s agitation through a participatory process of decision making. By adopting such a process, destruction and suffering can be minimized. It is unfortunate that we are not able to use such a powerful toolwhichwill make planning and implementation more cultured and sensitive.

What is the Peace Club?

Peace club is a program proposed for students in schools and colleges. This can be used in both urban and rural setting. We have somehow come to accept a norm that a third party should intervene when there is a conflict between two individuals or groups. We have also come to believe that the police and army are best positioned to bring peace. There is a serious problem when peace is brought through fear, as the moment the factor of fear is removed, conflict will resurface. Peace club is a process through which people learn to resolve their conflicts through a process of dialogue. For example when there is a conflict between two students, the peace club can invite them for a face to face discussion and resolve it instead of approaching a teacher for a solution. Teachers being an authority will always invoke fear in the minds of students.  A process of dialogue to resolve conflicts will be a rich experience for the students and they can continue to practice it in their family, in their community and when they become experts in the art of dialogue based solution, they may use it between countries and cultures. In a world where we have too many conflicts related to poverty, religion, culture and borders it is important that we have many people trained in the art of dialogue based solution. The beginning of this can be peace clubs in educational institutions of all levels. This process will ultimately make the society more peaceful.

What is nonviolent education?

Unfortunately, education as it is today, has become a tool for oppression. People who have managed to acquire higher education go on to occupy higher positions and continue to work towards their own economic and political advancement instead of using their office to serve who are less fortunate. Look at millions of parents spending their hard earned money onconvent education. Education has become the most profitable business today and Educational Institutions are competing to get richer. 

We have undertaken a small experiment to see how we can mainstream nonviolence into education. This will mean that every subject that is being taught should have a component of nonviolence. Like a pinch of salt will make the food tasty, a pinch of nonviolence can make the subject more meaningful. Let us take a moment to imagine the impact of turning higher educational programs like developmental studies into nonviolent developmental studies, governance program into nonviolent governance program, economy into nonviolent economy and media studies into a nonviolent media studies. Whichever specialty one pursues it can become a tool for making the student an instrument of anti people andanti poorinitiatives if the educators and learner are not engaged in looking at the subject from a nonviolence perspective. Educational institutions need to understand and articulate this aspect if they wish to create a peaceful society through the educational process. This will of course demand courage on the part of the educational institutions.

By: Rajagopal.P.V

*******************8

A Reflection/Maja Koene Award 2021

 

A Reflection

Maja Koene Award 2021

This year happens to be the 21st year that Maja left us from this material world. But she is still alive through the CESCI Centre in this far away Kadavoor village, near Madurai. After her departure the committee of CESCI has decided to create a Maja Koene Award for those who are doing good work in the society. This year the award went to six personalities under three categories, two for Social Activist, three for Social Journalist and one for Peace Promotion.

Mr. Ashok Sajjanhar a former ambassador was the chief guest and a sharing session was arranged on the 21st February morning. It was a wonderful opportunity for the awardees to share their good work in terms of what they are doing for the betterment of the society and also the process they adopted.  

·       Mr. Inamul Hasan is involved in many important activities including promotion of communal harmony and anti-liquor campaigns. He has undertaken many padaytras to mobilise people around critical issues that are impacting the society. Mr. Inamul Hasan is an inspiration to many young people and he provides them a basic understanding of Mahatma Gandhi and his philosophy.

·       Neki is a well-known organization led by a group of committed social workers like Mr. Pushparag in the district of Guna in Madhya Pradesh. Neki is involved in many activities in and around Guna district. Their contribution in the field of environment protection deserves a special mention. Their activities in the field of poverty eradication are appreciated by one and all. Neki has also transformed many acres of dry land into green land by involving local people of all ages and background. Initiatives like Neki ke Diwar (the wall of goodness), Neki Hospital, etc., are all good examples for others to follow.

·       Dr. Gopi Puthukode is a popular writer and his excellent work in the field of Malayalam literature is appreciated by one and all. Dr. Gopi Puthukode has published many books of which some have found their place in the school curriculum in Kerala. His work in the field of documenting local history is a path breaking initiative and its worth for other writers to follow his path.

·       Ms. Chithra Balasubramanian is a well-known journalist and her articles on critical issues are published in many magazines and journals on a regular basis. Through various discussion forums Ms. Chithra is helping people to deepen their understanding on Mahatma Gandhi and his ideas. She is also encouraging political leaders to speak about Mahatma Gandhi and his role by inviting them for discussions in channels. Through her work she is encouraging many young people to follow the values proposed by Mahatma Gandhi.

·       The Optimist Citizen is a publication initiated by a group of young people in Bhopal. This particular initiative is the result of a deep realization that media can be a creative tool to promote positive atmosphere in a society. In spite of all the hardships faced through years this group of young people has continued to publish this newspaper and influence the thought process of many. Their works is a path breaking task and are sure that their initiative will inspire the world of journalism in the coming years.

·       Dr. S. Kulandaisamy works through Gandhi Peace Foundation, Chennai. He has introduced Mahatma Gandhi and Vinoba Bhave to thousands of students and young people through his articles and books. Dr. Kulandaisamy with the help of Ms. Shembagavalli has taken the message of peace and nonviolence to many schools and colleges. He has also published a regular column in The Hindu for children. His work is recognized and appreciated nationally and globally by many individuals and organizations that are committed to the agenda of youth, peace, and nonviolence.

Listening to the stories of all the above awardees was highly inspiring. All of them have engaged communities for a long time in different ways and deserved such a recognition. The award constituted in the name of Maja is going to the right persons and her spirit continue to live. 

Visitors in the CESCI Campus

·       Mr. Avani Kumar from Delhi was at CESCI to participate in it’s general Body meeting and also to participate in the Maja Award program. His lifestyle demonstrated how Trusteeship works in practice.  It was really good to see his large heartedness. In the CESCI meeting he offered the Jai Jagat Centre as a gift for organizing training programs for promoting peace and nonviolence. Generally, people are fighting for wealth but here is a person, who believes in giving away wealth, property so that it can be put into common good for promoting peace and justice in the world.

·       Another person was Mr. Anish from Bangalore.  It was his first visit to CESCI and here he had an opportunity to meet and interact with many people. Before leaving for Bangalore Rajaji asked him what is his take away? He said, as a corporate employee he never had any chance to see such organizations and such people. CESCI has given him the opportunity to enhance his understanding on peace building process. He is eager to explore more by being with Ekta Parishad in the field. He is willing to offer his services by supporting youth training programme through creative art.

·       Mr. Arun Sheravat from Delhi was here to meet Rajaji and also to participate in the award program. His stay in CESCI for about a week made him completely a different person. He never thought that a place or a group of people can influence his life so deeply. His idea to promote bicycle as a solution to the problem of climate crisis and he is looking for partners in this project.  Here I can recollect an incident that an Australian friend who visited CESCI told me that “after spending few weeks in this campus and the experience transformed him to a new person”. With this new realization he went back to his wife in Australia and better relationship turned colorful.

Many other discussions were also held in the campus during those two weeks in February 2021. One can feel that many decisions impacting at many levels of actions were taken in CESCI and these discussions were always to promote peace and justice in the world.  

Biju Kallidumbil

23rd February 2021

A Call for National Action

A Call for National Action

A draft used for discussion on the 16th October 2020

 

One sentence that is common in every article or in every statement is that “the overall situation of the country demands immediate attention of all of us”. This particular sentence speaks a lot for the situation that we are facing today. The farmers, the laborers, the Adivasis, the poor and the middleclass all are saying the same. Let us admit that this is not something special to India alone.  Many countries are facing the same situation as a result of Covid-19. What is shocking is that the political and economic leadership of many countries are refusing to learn lessons from the Covid-19 situation. They think by accelerating the same economic and development model they can solve the problems. They think by reducing democratic space and by suppressing the voice of Human Rights Organization’s and Peoples Organizations they can push their agenda faster. There is a complete takeover of the entire system by the corporate lobbies. To a great extent they have also silenced the media and the judiciary in every country.

 

The size of the challenge in-front of us should encourage people like us to stand up to the challenge. Of course the challenge is so big that it is not within the reach of and one individual or one organization to deal with it. This is the time for us to put together our ideas,   capacities and   resources to build resistance and also to build pressure for change and a change that is in the interest of millions of marginalized.

 

The agenda proposed by Jai Jagat global campaign was drawn from the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations and these four pillars can be accepted as the base for our coming together. They are;

 

1.     Eradication of Poverty

2.     Reducing Inequality

3.     Mitigation of Climate Crisis

4.     Bringing an end to War and Violence

 

In countries like India we should also include the issue of land, labour, livelihood, and legislations (4 L’s) in our action plan which will have an immediate impact in the life of millions of those who are in a survival struggle.

 

Around the above issues there should be mass mobilization across the country. Many of us will have to devote our time and energy for this task in the coming days.  Each one of us will have to take a particular region and travel through the region for many months. This mobilization can lead to state; regional level actions that can send a strong message to the decision makers at the top that people are no more ready to accept business as usual. A charter of change can also come out of this process. 

 

The third year should be for a larger and sustained nonviolent struggle at the national level demanding change.

 

This National action should continue in different forms to the year 2024 and should deeply impact the manifesto of different political parties as well as the result of the election. This mobilization may also decide the kind of people who get elected and the level of commitment they hold for the suffering masses. This will mean the following.

 

·       2021- contact building and mobilization across India

·       2022 - local, state and regional actions

·       2023 - sustained National action (May be a foot march from different directions to Delhi)

·       2024 - Impacting the national election for basic changes in the governance system

 

At this stage we have the option to act or not to act, risk our life or not to risk, history will judge us according to what we may do today. This is the time to give a call to act within whatever capacity we have or at whichever level we can. Acting with the people is the only way that we can change the situation in which we are today.

  

PEACE in South Asia

PEACE in South Asia

Dear friends

 

South Asia Peace Alliance (SAPA) was formed with an idea that the peace process can be strengthened within the South Asia region. We realized that it is important to have peace builders group in every country of Asia but it was also important that they come together at the regional level to deepen their understanding about conflict and peace building. The Quaker friendship from England was able to give us initial support to shape this forum. As a result we were able to organise meetings and trainings in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Friends from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bhutan also participated in some meetings and workshops. I remember that many trainings and meetings were held in India along with Ekta Parishad inorder to showcase how peace building can go hand in hand with the struggle for Justice.

 

I think this is also time for us to recognize the contributions made by Shobha Gautam, Nasir Bhai, Thayaparan, Karamat bhai and Tassin and many others. From the side of India contributions by Babulalji, Rita Roy and Vijay Bharati were also very important. Of course there are many others who made significant contributions to take this process forward. To a great extent the entire credit goes to our dear Stuart Bhai, that he brought   all of us together on a platform and helped us to create a process like SAPA.  Our dear friends Nasir Bhai and Babulal ji have left us in the meantime.  Both of them were great souls and were always available to strengthen the South Asia Peace process.

 

I believe that we are now faced with too many conflicts related to land and livelihood resources across Asia. We are also facing conflicts related to Climate and Poverty. Covid-19 has also brought new challenges that we need to address without losing time. What we now notice across the globe is that the state is becoming dictatorial and oppressive. This is going to create new type of conflicts between the people and the state.  May I take this opportunity to suggest that we should come together as early as possible to reflect on the Asian situation and plan for future course of action. 

 

As far as I remember the original idea was that we will identify at least one peace activist in every district of South Asia. This may look like a big task, but we need to begin in a small way. All of us put together I am sure we may have contacts at least in three hundred district of the region. We were also keen to bring together some seriously minded peace leaders of the region to address some of the major conflicts that we are facing in the region.

 

 

CESCI Madurai, Tamil Nadu will be organizing the Maja Koene Award Program on the 21st of February 2021. CESCI is willing to host a South Asia peace meet along with the Award program. We are invited for the 18-20th of February and also participate in the award program.  I will be happy to know whether you can find resources to travel to Madurai and back in the month of February 2021. It will be good if we can accept this invitation and come together

 

With warm regards

Rajagopal.P.V

 

Subhash, Ganga, Jagat, Taya

Goswamy

Vijay, Yogesh, Jill, Aneesh

Debasis, Scaria/Satish

Ashok, Inamal, Biju

Balakrishnanji, Calicut

 

 

Banking for the Poor

 

Banking for the Poor

 

The idea of grain bank or Anaj bank is very old and time tested. As you travel through rural areas especially in the Northern part of India, you can experience many type of grain banks managed by the village communities. These are designed and developed by village communities in-order to deal with period of crisis.

In the recent past many Social organisations who found this idea convincing enough have started promoting Grain Bank among the marginalised communities. The idea of grain bank is simple that you save some grain during the harvest period and pool the same in to a community managed system. Those who have contributed to the grain bank can benefit from the bank when there is a crisis. I have seen grain banks of different size in different villages. The biggest grain bank I have ever visited was in a village called Mangaon in district Umaria of Madhya Pradesh. This grain bank was so big that the bank can protect the entire village population even if they face draught/flood for two years.

Of course the grain bank developed by the farmers will be very different from the type of bank developed by the poor people. The size and scope of the bank will drastically differ according to the socio economic situation of the people behind it.

Grain Bank idea was also very popular in Mahasamund area of Chhattisgarh. Village after village they have initiated children’s bank as well as grain bank. The idea of children’s bank received many awards and is now widely accepted as an important initiative of Ekta Parishad.

During my journey through Jhansi of Uttar Pradesh I found that many poor communities have set up their own grain bank and these grain banks are the backbone of the poor families. Members of these banks can borrow grain at the time of need and return the same with a small interest when they have regular income.

Because the local people have taken ownership of this process, it is rare that someone would try to cheat the bank. There is also community pressure on individuals as they know that the failure of one person can lead to failure of the very system that they were trying to promote as a security net.

With an initial support from outside an organised village community can begin a grain bank and also of a size according to the amount of money available. One should calculate at least 10 kg per person and multiply according to the number of poor people in a village. General experience is that the well to do families don’t borrow from these banks as they have their own arrangements to deal with crisis. So if there are 100 families in a particular village the grain bank can begin with 1000 kgs of wheat or rice according to the area of operation. The process can begin as soon as the village committee can identify a place for keeping the grain and a person to coordinate the operations. On a weekly basis the committee will verify all the accounts and transactions.

Promoting grain bank is something in which we have sufficient experience. The new dimension that we want to introduce here is the idea of Labour Bank.

As a daily wage earner the only asset I have in my control is my physical labour. I am willing to sell my body labour every day in-order to buy my ration to keep my family going. The problem begins when people who are willing to sell their physical labour find no market to sell it. If I don’t sell my labour today, I can’t keep it for tomorrow. My body energy of today can’t be reserved for tomorrow.

If you have money that you don’t want to use today can be deposited in a bank and you can draw when you need it. Can we see labour as money or wealth and allow him or her to deposit it in a labour bank? Can one deposit the body labour against grain so that the family will not go hungry?

This is a fact that the grain bank can’t provide work but it can guarantee food grain against the calculated labour of 8 hours and can provide food grain for an equal amount of money. (Say Rs 200/- is the cost of my labour for a day, so I can deposit it against 10 kgs of grain) and against an undertaking that when I am able to sell my labour I will return this grain to the Bank. This is also possible that a particular person has no work for a week and he/she would like to make an undertaking for a bigger quantity of grain with a commitment to return when work is available.

We are also exploring the possibility that the bank can generate work projects that can create community assets or the bank can at least keep a record of unemployed people and negotiate with projects where manual labour is in demand.

The important aspects are that

·       Shramshakti should be recognised as an asset.

·       Against shramshakti one should find enough food for the family.

·       Shram Bank should find work possibilities if individuals have difficulty to do it on their own.

·       Shram Bank should put an end to distress migration by providing food grain until some decent work is found.

If the government was serious enough about land reforms to address the problems of poverty and migration we could have continued on the Land Reforms track. In the absence of any willingness on the part of political parties whether from right or the left, it is important for us to develop new approach to deal with the problem of poverty related migration.

Shram bank, if properly organized can challenge the feudal system that still exists in many parts of the country, where the labourers are totally depended on the feudal system for their survival. In the long run we hope this shram bank idea may influence the state to redesign their anti poverty programs and policies.  This concept of Shram Bank can become popular not only nationally but also globally, as people are looking for new approaches that are practical and sustainable.

 

The steps proposed for any grain bank to be operational are the following.

a.      In the village there is an organized community.

b.      There is an experienced and committed leadership to coordinate this program.

c.       The community has already demonstrated their capacity to carry such programs.

d.      The community representatives have already participated in some nonviolent struggles to protect their land and resources.

As we know that the people who benefit from the shram bank are poor and migrant labourers, let us assume that they may not be in a position to return the grain within one month time (some may, some may not). The grain bank should be able to visualize an initial investment for a period of three months to keep it going.

 

This program will also be built around the concept of Dan (gift) proposed by Acharya Vinoba Bhave. During his bhoodan (land gift) movement. He spoke about the concept of dan to build an inclusive society at the bottom, which will include, shram dan (gift of labour), samay dan (gift of time), budhi dan (gift of intellectual capacity), sampathy dan (gift of property), etc. We will apply this concept where ever possible in building a grain/shram bank. We are sure that there are well meaning people everywhere and they will come forward to provide whatever Dan they are able to provide.

Women as Nonviolent Peace-builders

 Women as Nonviolent Peace-builders


India has a long history of nonviolent peace-builders. Gautam Buddha, Mahavira of the Jain religion and more recently Mahatma Gandhi are all exemplary nonviolent leaders. In particular Gandhi profiled women as the harbingers of nonviolence when he said:

 

“To call woman the weaker sex is a libel; it is man’s injustice to woman. If by strength what is meant, is brute strength, then, indeed, women’s brute is less than men. If by strength what is meant is moral power, then women are immeasurably men’s superior. Has she not got greater intuition? Is she not more self-sacrificing? Has she not greater courage? …If nonviolence is the law of our being, then the future is with women… Who can make a more effective appeal to the heart than women?” (Gandhi in Young India, 10-4-1930, p. 121)

 

Appreciating that Gandhi’s remarks were written almost a century back, it still holds that women in India do play a significant role in the (joint) family and are transmitters of values of nonviolence. In many cases women are not able necessarily to extend these values to the larger community or society because of their confinement to the household or the lack of opportunities to exercise social or societal leadership. Oftentimes they’re remaining invisible leads to more violence.

 

Through the formation of women’s groups in rural and urban settings, women have generated opportunities for political, social and economic participation. When women take up collective action, they are able to bring forward various nonviolent solutions to community or local problems. Group formation is generally seen as consisting of savings and micro-credit schemes and rarely they are attributed with building peace. An example is that one of the most well-known micro-credit groups in India is SEWA or Self-Employed Women’s Association, and it has done enormous work in women’s labour organizing to provide livelihood security; however there work in mitigating the effects of the Hindu-Moslem riots and strengthening communal harmony over the past twenty years has got scant attention.

  Profiling Women’s Capacities as Nonviolent Leaders at the Grassroots-Level

There are numerous women groups across the world carrying out peace in post-conflict situations, in areas ravaged by war or forced exile.  Women also have no doubt a special role in refugee settings. But women who exercise leadership at the grassroots level in places marked by ongoing poverty and oppression is nonviolent peacebuilding. Two examples come to mind where women are countering indirect violence: firstly, Irom Sharmila, a woman who has been on forced feeding for the past fifteen years because she has declared a fast until death against the Indian Special Armed Forces which she maintains, are occupying the state of Manipur in North-eastern India. The second is Krishnammal, a 90 year Dalit woman activist whose struggle for the land rights of the marginalized Dalit poor women in the southern state of Tamilnadu for the past 47 years, continues unabated. These women symbolize nonviolence, so by depicting their endurance and efforts to contain violence, actually creates positive conditions for nonviolence.

 In India, given the multiple oppressions for women, women have developed capacities for nonviolence that goes unrecognized. These can be profiled to help uplift women and redouble their efforts at nonviolent action as a way to preempt conflict.

 Ekta Mahila Manch

 Within the people’s movement struggling for land, namely, Ekta Parishad, there are about 10,000 women leaders. These women are advocating for their land rights in marches, rallies and sit-ins in many states across the country. Only one or two have been recognized for their achievements (Narmadabai received the European Women’s Prize in 2010.) Being a landless woman or a woman coming from the Adivasis (indigenous) community, means that there is a double struggle for dignity and livelihood. If women can break through these barriers and find opportunities to exercise their leadership using nonviolence, this is an amazing feat.

 One of the ways to recognize and strengthen women’s leadership is by carrying out various forms of capacity development, whether training or action programs or mentoring programs. In each case the grassroots leaders have a lot to teach in terms of how they manage their conflicts nonviolently. The capacity development is to get them to extend their skills to a larger set of community-based problems as defined by them.

 Building up for the Jai Jagat 2018/2020 campaign

 The leadership training is focused on a set of events that is part of the Jai Jagat campaign. The Jai Jagat campaign is in two parts: the first is national, with nonviolent economy being centered as the basic structure for building a nonviolent society. The second is a solidarity linking various international efforts in a global campaign. These are events which everyone can participate in.

 Setting up a women’s cooperative

 The idea for the capacity building is to have a group of 30 women trainers from around the country that can support ongoing capacity building of grassroots women. This will be coordinated by the Ekta Mahila Manch out of the Nav Rachna center, an all-women center in central Madhya Pradesh.

 

National Training Courses

 

International Training Courses

 

Friends of Ekta Mahila Manche: